Mass
transit systems can be likened to the circulatory system of a city in the sense
that they help circulate the citizens throughout the body of a city. The types of systems that these cities employ
can vary based upon the needs of its citizens, but perhaps the most well-known
in popular culture is the subway. Unlike
many other major cities in the United States, however, Cincinnati never
constructed its own subway. Or perhaps
more accurately, it never finished
building its subway system as the program was effectively orphaned by the Great
Depression. However, what happened to
the remains of the subway that had been completed, but were obviously never
opened to the public?
Naturally,
it remained buried beneath the streets of the city that it had been intended to
serve. While it was never entirely
forgotten, the city elected to leave it unfinished. So what purpose could an unfinished subway
serve? If Cincy's solution during the early 2000s was any indication, a tourist
attraction or local point of interest could at least capture the public
imagination, if not recoup the investment.
Tours of the relatively finished sections of the subway were offered and
local legends sprang up to keep the boondoggle in the public eye. There is no other word to illustrate what
Cliff Radel described as "$13 million dollar... hole in the ground."[1] Additionally, the status of the abandoned
subway tunnels offer a fascinating "what if" scenario when it comes
to the Queen City. What if the subway
had been completed? Would Cincinnati have become less reliant upon cars and busing
for mass transit, or would the subway have fallen victim to the ravages of
time? Still, $13 million is one
expensive mistake to make on a city-wide scale.
Radel, Cliff. "Subway Legend Has Never Left the
Station." Cincinnati Enquirer (1923-2009), May 24, 2003. 13, 22.
https://search-proquest-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/docview/1906964680?accountid=39387.
[1] Radel,
Cliff. "Subway Legend Has Never Left the Station." Cincinnati
Enquirer (1923-2009), May 24, 2003. 22.
No comments:
Post a Comment